Waymo 27% Market Share, Tesla Loses $152B, Plus $1.2B SPAC
Inside analysis from Morgan Stanley and Goldman Sachs data
👋 Welcome back to another week of autonomous vehicle market insights.
This edition covers Waymo's market dominance in San Francisco, the economics of robotaxi profitability, and international expansion moves.
⏱️ ~1,800 words, 9 min read
🚗 The Robotaxi Economics Revolution - From Hype to Profitability
The autonomous vehicle industry is experiencing a fundamental shift from technological demonstration to economic viability, with Waymo leading the charge in San Francisco while Chinese players are reshaping cost structures globally.
According to Bond Capital's latest analysis, Waymo has officially surpassed Lyft's market share in San Francisco with 27%.
However, the devil remains in the details. As discussed in earlier articles, the Yipit data underlying this analysis only captures trips that both start and end within Waymo's current operating domain, excluding crucial trips like airport routes.
But Harry Campbell’s data analysis suggests Waymo's actual San Francisco market share sits at approximately 20.5%, a figure that aligns closely with Yipit's domain-specific estimates given the city's density.
This penetration becomes even more significant when considering that Waymo is poised to expand to freeway operations and airport connectivity, segments that will dramatically amplify both market share and revenue per vehicle.
But market share is only half the equation. For AVs to scale commercially, unit economics must pencil out. That’s where things are starting to get interesting.
Morgan Stanley's cost analysis reveals a compelling trajectory: current-generation Waymo vehicles cost over $120,000, but upcoming models could drop to $85,000, with Goldman Sachs projecting specialized robotaxi vehicles reaching $50,000 by 2030.
Chinese manufacturers are accelerating this timeline aggressively. Baidu CEO Robin Li has stated the company can achieve sub-$30,000 vehicle costs, while Pony AI's seventh-generation models promise 70% BOM cost savings. Goldman Sachs reinforces this trajectory, estimating China's robotaxi vehicle costs at $44,000 in 2025, declining to $35,000 by 2030 and $32,000 by 2035.
This cost compression is creating a path to profitability that seemed impossible just years ago. Goldman Sachs' estimates the cost breakdown as follows:
61% of vehicle cost comes from the base vehicle itself, followed by 21% for sensors and autonomous driving software, and 18% for domain controllers. The firm expects further price decreases across all major components, with software costs particularly benefiting from economies of scale as more robotaxis enter service to share R&D spending burdens.
Goldman Sachs also projects that robotaxi per-vehicle costs of goods sold will decline from $20,100 to $18,900 annually by 2025-2035 in Chinese tier-1 cities. They further identify operational leverage points: remote monitoring costs are expected to decrease as technology evolves, with Chinese players targeting 50-100 vehicles per remote operator versus the current 20 vehicles per person.
Operating robotaxis is one challenge, but acquiring customers presents an entirely different obstacle. Robotaxi operators like Waymo are increasingly partnering with established platforms like Uber to access rider demand, but this dependency comes at a significant cost.
TD Cowen estimates these platforms command up to 30% of gross bookings, while Goldman Sachs estimates are at ~10% of GMV. Regardless of the exact percentage, this represents a substantial revenue share that robotaxi operators must factor into their unit economics.
That money appears well invested, however:
The Electric Vehicle Intelligence Report, which surveyed over 8,000 U.S. consumers weighted by education, race, gender, age, income, and geography, reveals a striking brand recognition gap: while Waymo leads the autonomous vehicle revolution, the average American remains unaware of their existence.
The survey found that three-quarters of consumers are either unfamiliar with or have no opinion about Waymo, with recognition dropping to just 11% for brands like Zoox and May Mobility. This stands in stark contrast to Uber's 84% brand familiarity rate.
While Waymo's limited geographic presence partially explains this awareness deficit, it underscores the massive distribution advantage that established platforms provide.
Consumer education represents an additional hurdle, as many remain skeptical about riding in autonomous vehicles. This is precisely where Uber's reach becomes transformational - their established user base can access robotaxi services through a simple app toggle.
However, this partnership dynamic raises strategic questions for Uber's long-term positioning.
While Waymo may eventually dominate the Bay Area independently, the 74% brand unawareness suggests they'll still profit strongly from Uber's distribution power outside their current operating zones for rapid scaling in new cities like Miami, Washington D.C. or international markets. The question isn't whether the partnership ends entirely, but how power dynamics shift as Waymo proves self-sufficiency in mature markets.
This creates a negotiation leverage: Waymo's Bay Area success becomes a bargaining chip to reduce Uber's revenue share. If Waymo can demonstrate they generate substantial revenue without Uber in their strongest market, why pay the same platform fees in newer territories?
Uber's fragmentation strategy of operating multiple AV partnerships simultaneously becomes increasingly critical for maintaining platform leverage. Rather than betting everything on Waymo, Uber needs more autonomous vehicle players operationally active across their network to prevent any single partner from gaining disproportionate negotiating power. The more AV companies Uber has actively serving rides the stronger Uber's position becomes.
Another interesting observation is Tesla's unique position in the survey. While only 13% are unfamiliar with Tesla, 42% of respondents hold negative opinions about the company.
This brand polarization reached its peak this week as CEO Elon Musk engaged in an unprecedented public feud with President Trump just days before Tesla's planned Austin robotaxi launch. The conflict, triggered by disagreements over Trump's "Big Beautiful Bill," escalated to mutual threats and insults, with Tesla's stock plummeting 14% and losing $152 billion in market cap as investors fear federal retaliation.
The timing couldn't be worse for Tesla's robotaxi ambitions. NHTSA is already reviewing Tesla's robotaxi plans ahead of the Austin launch, and Trump's administration now has multiple leverage points - from ongoing Autopilot investigations to potential SEC scrutiny of Musk's public statements. As one automotive executive noted, Musk's "surface area for attack is remarkable," with federal agencies positioned to potentially derail the robotaxi program through regulatory pressure.
My take: We're witnessing the transition from robotaxi proof-of-concept to economically viable transportation category. If Chinese manufacturers maintain their cost leadership and avoid major safety incidents, expect to see strong Chinese presence in non-U.S. markets globally. Meanwhile, has Elon Musk fumbled the ball at the goal line with his Trump feud just days before Tesla's critical Austin launch? All eyes on June 12th.
🔗 BOND Capital / Harry Campbell / Reuters / WSJ / Goldman Sachs /EV Intelligence Report / Bloomberg / Road to Autonomy / Forbes
🚚 Another Autonomous Trucking SPAC Hits the Road
Self-driving truck startup Plus is the latest company to head for the public markets, announcing a $1.2 billion SPAC merger with Churchill Capital Corp IX. The deal will provide up to $300 million in capital and aims to fund the company through to its commercial launch of factory-built autonomous trucks in 2027.
The autonomous trucking landscape is experiencing a capital markets renaissance, with Plus and Kodiak both pursuing SPAC transactions to fund their path to commercialization.
Unlike Kodiak, which paired its SPAC trust with an additional $110 million in committed capital, Plus’s entire $300 million funding pool is tied up in redeemable SPAC trust proceeds. However, Plus’s partner, Churchill Capital, previously achieved zero redemptions on a Sam Altman-backed energy company. Nonetheless, the final amount could be much lower than $300 million, depending on investor sentiment.
Across the autonomous trucking space, we’re seeing a spectrum of business models emerge:
At one end of the spectrum, Bot Auto pursues full vertical integration, wanting to control everything from technology development to fleet operations. Aurora occupies the middle ground, maintaining control over critical functions like remote assistance while partnering with OEMs for manufacturing. At the other end, Plus represents the pure software play - high-margin technology licensing where OEMs handle everything from vehicle manufacturing to service and remote operations, with scaling expected to come through their OEM partnerships.
Source: Plus Investor Presentation
Plus aims to launch in the USA in 2027, followed shortly by European deployment in 2028 according to their current roadmap. This aligns with broader industry timelines and suggests 2027 could indeed become autonomous trucking's breakthrough year, with multiple players reaching commercial scale simultaneously.
Source: Plus Investor Presentation
If we look at valuation, the gap is striking. Aurora is currently valued at $11.6 billion and is considered the frontrunner in the space. Kodiak follows with a valuation around $2.5 billion. Plus, with its $1.2 billion pre-money valuation, sits significantly lower.
That leaves a gap of $9–10 billion. Which begs the question: is Aurora truly that far ahead on the tech side? I can’t answer that — but it’s a question worth asking.
History suggests that first-mover advantages in transportation technology often prove less durable when faced with more capital-efficient competitors. The question becomes whether this premium reflects sustainable technological differentiation or temporary market positioning that could erode as competitors reach commercial deployment.
The sector's economic implications extend far beyond individual company valuations. Autonomous trucking addresses real labor shortages and efficiency challenges in freight transportation, providing clearer value propositions than consumer robotaxis. Commercial fleets operate on predictable routes with quantifiable ROI calculations, making adoption decisions more straightforward than consumer transportation choices driven by convenience and experience factors.
My take: It's a positive sign that, in addition to Aurora and potentially Kodiak, Plus is now stepping onto the public stage. It brings transparency, it holds teams accountable and it allows us to compare business models. And that's exactly what this industry needs. Visibility. Discipline. And real benchmarks. It's not just good for Plus — it's good for the entire autonomy space.
🔗 Reuters (1) / Plus (1) / Plus (2) / Road to Autonomy
💡 Quick Takes:
🏗️ China Scales the World's Largest AV Mining Deployment
EACON Mining Technology has commenced the world's largest autonomous haulage deployment at Guanghui Energy's Baishihu coal mine, with 400 autonomous trucks handling extreme conditions including 102 km/h winds and 3-10km loaded uphill distances. This signals autonomous technology maturation beyond passenger vehicles into heavy industrial applications.
→ Efficiency and safety wins could turn mining into the AV industry’s first cash cow.
🚘 Pony.ai Launches Gen-7 Robotaxi Road Tests
Testing is now live in Guangzhou and Shenzhen. The Gen-7 system delivers 70% cost reduction in autonomous hardware, all-weather readiness, and modular platform integration. Target: 1,000+ production-ready vehicles by end of 2025.
→ Pony is moving from pilot to product — and cost-efficiency is now the competitive front line.
🕵️ Tesla’s Robotaxi Plans Shrouded in Secrecy
Tesla is actively blocking Reuters' public records request regarding its planned Austin robotaxi launch, claiming release would reveal "deployment procedure, process, status and strategy" and "irreparably harm Tesla." The secrecy underscores high stakes around Tesla's first commercial robotaxi deployment.
→ If Tesla succeeds, it will be the industry’s biggest storytelling pivot in years. If not, it could validate the challenges of going vision-only.
🔗 Reuters
📚 Worth Reading
“AI Trendlines” Report
🔗 BOND Capital
📊 Weekly Performance
Note: Stock performance data as of June 08, 2025. Past performance does not indicate future returns.
Thanks for reading!
If you found value in this newsletter, please consider sharing it with a friend or colleague who might benefit from these insights.
And if you haven't already, subscribe to stay updated on the latest developments in the autonomous driving industry.